Comments for Low Carbon Options

Comment on Scrubbing CO2 out of the air….Hmmmm by Dave Percy

Dave Percy — Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:30:09 +0000

Good post, another point is that CO2 does not begin slow cooling until the temperature falls to about -70 F. So other than the Antarctic in the winter, CO2 has not much effect, right? If you disagree, I would be happy to read more.

-Dave

Comment on 2011 UK’s Energy Innovation Awards by Connecticut Energy

Connecticut Energy — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:49:02 +0000

Connecticut Energy can lower your current electric bill and save you money on CT Energy for your home or business.

Comment on Do regional and national security issues triumph over commitments to low carbon futures? The case for South Africa by Melvin Woodhouse

Melvin Woodhouse — Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:06:50 +0000

Clive le Roux, Senior general manager: Nuclear for ESKOM …

“Q: What is Eskom’s view on the future nuclear expansion programme?

A: Other than coal-fired power stations, the only feasible alternative for base load electricity in South Africa is nuclear power stations. http://financialresults.co.za/2010/eskom_ar2010/gb_nuclear.htm”

Present and future nuclear generation in RSA appears to use sea water

http://www.eskom.co.za/content/Nuclear-1-Transmission%20Integration%20for%20KSW(12Feb-5Mar)~1.pdf

So because nuclear could use sea water it has an advantage over forms of generation depending on shared rivers.

If RSA doesnt want to depend on external power generation, then is should also be wary of generating power using (influent) transboundary waters.

Comment on Welcome by Patrick Reynolds

Patrick Reynolds — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:33:47 +0000

test